logo  ELT Concourse teacher training
Concourse 2

Indefinite or impersonal pronouns


This guide deals with pronouns other than the personal pronouns (i.e., I, me, him, her, yourself, your etc.) or pronouns identifying a specific noun (it, they etc.).
In that sense only, we are talking about impersonal or indefinite pronouns, although the term is horribly inexact because these pronouns often refer to people and in the case of some categories, to particular individuals or things.
For the sake of conciseness and clarity, we'll also use the term indefinite pronouns because these pronouns do not refer to particular people or things in the way that you, me, it, they, them, ourselves etc. do.
In summary, these pronouns are either impersonal or indefinite (and sometimes both).
There is a separate guide to personal pronouns on this site.



Apart from the three forms of personal pronouns (personal: I, me, you, they etc., reflexive: myself, themselves, ourselves etc. and genitive / possessive: my, your, his, mine, their etc.), there are the following main classes of pronouns and this guide will take them one at a time.


Is it a pronoun or determiner?

Because most of the words analysed in the guide can act as pronouns or determiners, it's worth pausing to explain the difference.

Determiners come before nouns, noun phrases or pronouns and often have an alternative of or of the construction:
Both parents are here
Both of the children are here
Neither of them want to be here
Which of the books do you want?
Those of us who don't want to see the film will go and eat
I want that book
Pronouns proper replace the noun to which they refer and do not have the alternative of constructions.  Some pronouns, especially which and that can stand for entire clauses.  They can stand as the subject or object of a verb:
Both have arrived
Neither is useful
Which do you want?
Those are nice
That was interesting
I enjoyed those
I gave everything away

Determiners and pronouns are closely related word classes with many items acting in both roles.  Here's the list:

determiners or pronouns:
demonstratives: this, that, these, those, the former ... the latter
determiner use pronoun use To this list, some would add the one ... the other as in, e.g.:
We must use the one solution or the other
I want that book I want that
Let me have those tomatoes No, not those, these
He gave me this PC She sold this
The former solution is the best I prefer the latter
some and any
determiner use pronoun use The some-series is reserved for assertive uses usually and the any-series for non-assertive uses.
For more on this, see the guide to assertion and non-assertion (linked below).
I'd like some coffee I'd like some
I don't have any money I don't have any
many and much
determiner use pronoun use many can occur in assertive and non-assertive sense.
much is generally confined to non-assertive negative or question structures.
We don't have many friends We have many at home
There's isn't much butter I can't see much
enough, a lot of, several
determiner use pronoun use enough and a lot of can be used assertively or non-assertively and for mass or count nouns.
several is confined usually to assertive uses with count nouns only.
We have enough sugar We have read enough
They have a lot of space We don't have a lot
They have several books with them I have several
few, fewer, fewest, a few and little, less, least, a little
determiner use pronoun use Traditionally, and prescriptively, few, fewer, fewest, a few are confined to count nouns and
little, less, least, a little are confined to mass nouns but there are exceptions in use and the distinction is sometimes slightly fuzzy:
There are fewer people here
There are less people here than I expected
We have the fewest data
We have the least data
would all be acceptable according to circumstance, setting and level of formality.
There are few things he likes He sold few
We have fewer complaints The fewest we need is six
There are a few things to say I brought a few
There is little beer in the fridge They sold little
People have less money these days Take less, please
I have the least luggage She wants least
We have a little time I'll only take a little
more and most
determiner use pronoun use When most is a pronoun it is often indistinguishable from its use as a determiner but with an omitted noun.
See the note below.
Have more cake Have more
She spent most days in bed She wasted most
either and neither
determiner use pronoun use The pronoun use of these two words is unusual and often slightly formal.
Take either book Can I have either?
Take neither book You can have neither
determiner use pronoun use The pronoun use is unusual and formal.
Each child got a present They gave a present to each
all, half, both
determiner use pronoun use As a pronoun all is unusual.
These three items can also be pre-determiners.  See the link below for more.
Take all the food Winner takes all
Give me half the money Give me half
Can I have both cases? Take both
determiner use pronoun use The use of numerals as pronouns is debatable because it is almost always possible to recover a unique noun which has been elided.
I want six beers Bring me seven
Only determiners: no and every
determiner use pronoun use The pronoun for no is none (which cannot function as a determiner).
The pronoun for every is everyone, -body, -thing (and none can act as a determiner).
She has no money *She has no
Every child got a present *The gave a present to every
Only pronouns: none, some-, any- and no-series, others
determiner use pronoun use See above for the relationship between no and none.
The determiner equivalents of the -thing, -one, -body series are the bare some, any and every items.
other is a determiner equivalent of others.
*I took none books I took none
*Somebody people called Somebody called
*Does anyone child need lunch? Does anyone want this?
*They arrived with others people They arrived with others

It is not always a simple matter to identify whether words are acting as pronouns per se or simply that the noun phrase which they determine has been elided.
In spoken discourse, the latter is often the case as in, for example:
    Would you like some cake?
    No, thanks, I don't want any
    I asked for three keys but they only sent two (keys)
where the noun is elided and any and two retain their determiner status.
At other times, it is clear that the item is acting as a pronoun in its own right because the noun is not easily recoverable from the context or could be a wide range of possible phrases. For example:
    We have done enough (work?, damage?, business? etc.)

If you would like this list as a PDF document, click here.

In some analyses, the pronouns one and ones are considered the pronoun equivalent of indefinite articles or the determiner some as in, for example:
    Do you want a biscuit?
    Yes, I'll have one
    Do you want some biscuits?
    Yes, the chocolate ones, please


relative pronouns

This group includes the wh- series (who, which etc.), that and the zero pronoun.  For more, see the guide to pronoun relative clauses where each pronoun is covered.  Five examples will be enough here:

  1. The car which had the accident is in the workshop (which refers back, anaphorically, to the car as all relative pronouns refer back to their nouns)
  2. The man whose wallet you found is coming to collect it (a possessive relative pronoun which cannot be omitted)
  3. The man [∅] acting the fool is my brother (a reduced relative clause with the pronoun and the verb be omitted.  The full form would be The man who is acting the fool.  There is a good argument here that this is not a relative clause at all but an example of a participle clause post-modifying the noun)
  4. The person [∅] we want is on holiday today (with the relative pronoun, who(m) omitted as is allowed when it stands for the object of the verb in a defining relative clause)
  5. That's the car that he sold (with that as the relative pronoun in a defining relative clause, informally)


interrogative pronouns

These look exactly the same as the wh- relative pronouns but perform a different function.  The clue's in the name.
One addition to the list is what which is only colloquially (illiterately, if you prefer) used as a relative pronoun (The man what I saw).
The category is quite simple so a few examples will be enough.

  1. Who came to the meeting? (pronoun usually for people only)
  2. Which is your jacket? (pronoun for objects, used when faced with a selection)
  3. What do you think? (pronoun in the same meaning as which but used when there is no or a nearly infinite selection)
  4. Whose hat is this? (possessive interrogative pronoun)
  5. Whom did you see? (object case pronoun becoming ever rarer and replaced by who)

Both which, whose and what also act commonly as determiners (which computer, what house, whose car) but still in interrogative sentences in this case.


demonstrative pronouns

This is a closed class traditionally containing only this, that, these and those.  They are distinguished by number and by whether they refer to something near or far.  There are a number of uses:

discourse markers
The pronouns are used to make text cohere and point to what is to follow (cataphoric reference) or what precedes (anaphoric reference).  For example:
    This is what I mean ... →
    ← ... and that is the reason I'm late
    I want to make these three suggestions ... →
    ← ... so those are my reasons for not voting
The demonstrative pronouns this and these can be used to refer forward (cataphorically) and back (anaphorically) but that and those can only refer anaphorically.
The pronouns that and those only have a determiner function in, for example:
    Those who don't come to the meeting will be able to vote by post
    That which I really dislike is ...
(This is a formal and rather rare use.  Normally, what is preferred to that which.)
pointing (deictic function)
This is the most familiar use.  For example:
    This is my boss, Mary
are the people I wanted you to meet
    Those are my roommates
    That is her husband
Note that these words can only be used for impersonal objects of verbs unless they are followed by a noun such as person and are functioning as determiners:
    I will use that key to open the door
    I will use that to open the door
    We will elect that person as our representative
    *We will elect that as our representative
    We want these people thrown out
    *We want these thrown out
pronoun reference
It is often difficult to distinguish this from the determiner use:
    I want that (pronoun)
    I want that book (determiner)
    She selected those
    I think this coat would suit me
    I think this would suit me
With the pronouns, it is optional to use one(s), as in I want those ones.  If one(s) is included, the words act more as determiners of another pronoun.
As pronouns, the uses are slightly more restricted than they are when the words are determiners.  All four can be used as pronouns to refer to both people and things in positive and negative sentences so we allow:
    Those are my books
    These are the men you asked to see
    That isn't the manager who was here before
    This is the child I told you about

but in questions, while we accept:
    Who is that?
    Who is this?

we do not usually accept:
    *Who are those?
    *Who are these?
other demonstrative pronouns
While it is traditional to limit demonstrative pronouns to this, that, these and those, two other pronouns act in a very similar way but always come in pairs:
  • the former and the latter, for example:
        Both John and Mary went to live abroad; the former in America, the latter in France
  • the one and the other
        There is a clear potential benefit and a drawback.  We must try to take advantage of the one while minimising the danger of the other
These are functionally demonstrative pronouns and can be taught that way.


universal pronouns

These are: everyone, everybody, each, everything, all.  They fall into three categories:

personal and impersonal
everyone and everybody can only be used for people.  The others can be used for people and objects.
count and mass
Only all is used for mass nouns.  We can have all (the) sugar and all (the) potatoes but we cannot have *every sugar, *each sugar etc.
singular and plural
Again, only all can be used for plurals.  We can have they are all rude but not *everyone are rude
every, each and all also act frequently as determiners rather than pronouns proper.  For example:
Every guest received a written invitation
Each guest received a written invitation
All guests received a written invitation
each and all can act as pronouns, albeit slightly formally:
Three people came and I gave each a pen and a piece of paper
Twenty people arrived and all found a seat
every cannot act alone as a pronoun.  It must be combined with -thing or -one to do that.  Its sole use is as a determiner, therefore.  (But some and any can act as both pronouns and determiners [see below].)

less is more

multal and paucal pronouns

You will not be alone if you have not heard these terms (they defeat most spell checkers) but they are the usual ones used for these two sets of pronouns.
This group consists of:
Multal pronouns: many, more, much, most
Paucal pronouns: few, fewer, fewest, little, less, least
There is only one fundamental distinction with all of them: mass vs. count noun use:

many, more, most and few, fewer, fewest are used with count nouns:
If we are talking, e.g., about friends we can say:
    He doesn't have many but she has more and most are in London
    They have few but she even fewer; the fewest of anyone I know.
more much most and little, less, least are used with mass nouns:
Speaking, e.g., of food, we might have:
    We don't have much, but more than most
    We have a little, and less every day but they have the least.


  1. The distinction between a little and little and between a few and few is that the structures with a imply enough and the structures without a imply an inadequate amount.
        I have little interest and few opportunities to go
        She has a few friends and takes a little interest in their welfare
  2. Only real pedants will insist on not using less for count nouns as in, e.g.
        You have travelled less miles than me
    and, in fact, the use of less is routine for measurements, amounts of money and times
        less than two years
        less than 10 feet
        less than €5
    However, the uses of few and fewest for count nouns only are still common.


reciprocal pronouns

This is a small group consisting of just two multi-word pronouns:

each other
E.g., They really dislike each other
one another
E.g., They were all talking to one another about the play

The clue to the function of these two lies in the name: they are used when two or more nouns are doing the same thing and doing it reciprocally.

Generally, one another is slightly more formal and less common.  There are those who will insist that one another may only be used to represent more than two nouns but that is not a sustainable position although sentences such as
    John and Mary were talking to one another
sound odd to many people.
Using each other is a safe bet in all circumstances.

some any

some and any

The usual distinction here is to assert that the some- series is used in positive statements (that is to say, assertive uses) and the any- series in negatives and interrogatives (or non-assertive uses), so we get, e.g.:
    Somebody told him
    Has anybody arrived yet?
    I don't want anything to eat

There are, however, a few issues:

  1. We need to distinguish by function not grammar.  An offer is not a question so there is a difference between:
        Do you want anything to eat?  (Are you hungry?)
        Would you like something to eat?  (I'm offering some food.)
  2. Similarly, the speaker's understanding is important.  There is a difference between:
        Has somebody sent you a letter?
        Has anybody sent you a letter?
    In the first, the speaker may either have a person in mind or may be sure that a letter has arrived.  The second implies neither of those.
  3. Negatives are not only achieved with the use of not:
    Negative adverbials:
        He never goes anywhere
    (no, neither, nor work the same way)
        He hardly does any work
    (hardly, nearly, almost, little few etc. work the same way)
    Negative verbs:
        They failed to prevent any of the consequences
    (other negative verbs such as forget, stop, abort, destroy etc. work the same way)
    Negative adjectives:
        He's reluctant to do any more
    (other negative adjectives such as hard, difficult, impossible etc. work the same way)
  4. The pronoun any also means no matter who, no matter what:
        She eats anything
        Ask anyone
        Anyone can come

As with the other pronouns, there are distinctions:

personal and impersonal
somebody, someone, anybody, anyone are reserved for people
something, anything are reserved for objects
mass and count
only some and any can be used for mass nouns
plural and singular
only some and any can be used in the plural


negative pronouns

These are nobody, no-one, nothing, neither, none.

personal and impersonal
nobody, no-one, nobody are reserved for people
nothing is always for objects
none and neither can be used for both
    Nobody came
    No-one deserved the prize
    Nothing was there
    I asked my friends but none came
    I asked my brothers but neither came
    I wanted the beef but none was available
    I wanted one of the cars but neither was in my price range
mass and count
only no and none can be used for mass nouns
plural and singular
only no and none can be used in the plural

Concord issues

none is grammatically singular:
    She is waiting for her friends but none has arrived
is grammatically correct but, because of the proximity of the plural noun, many prefer
    She is waiting for her friends but none have arrived

The insertion of the preposition of often requires, or at least allows, the plural verb form so we can have either:
    She is waiting for her friends but none of them has arrived
    She is waiting for her friends but none of them have arrived

neither is also grammatically singular so we have
    Neither of her friends has arrived
but, again, because of the notion that we are referring to two people we also hear:
    Neither of her friends have arrived
and most people are, slightly inconsistently, happy with either formulation.
Using neither without of is quite a formal structure as in:
    I offered the boys the apples but neither wants one
and in this case, the pronoun is always singular so we do not allow:
    *I offered the boys the apples but neither want one

There is a link below to more about notional and proximity concord.



This pronoun / determiner has a number of uses:

  1. As a determiner, it is the stressed form of the indefinite article.  Compare, e.g.:
        A man waited at the gate
        One man waited at the gate
  2. It functions as a determiner and a pronoun:
        Two girls were in the classroom but I only spoke to the older one (pronoun)
        Two girls were in the classroom but I only spoke to the one older girl (determiner)
  3. It is used as a pronoun in both the singular and the plural:
        He offered me all of them and I took the blue ones
        He offered me all of them and I took the blue one
  4. It is used as an indefinite personal pronoun standing for people in general.  This use is considered formal.
        One can't be too careful with inflammable liquids, can one?
    In AmE, the one in the question tag will usually be replaced by you.
    There is a possessive form, one's, which takes the apostrophe.
        One must be careful with one's belongings when travelling by train
    There is no apostrophe on the plural use in 3.


several, a lot (of)  and enough

count and mass
These pronouns can only be plural with count nouns as in these determiner examples:
    They have several pens
    They have enough pens
    They have a lot of pens
    *They have several pen
    *They have enough pen
    *They have a lot of pen

or as pronouns:
    Do we need more dictionaries?
    No, we have several
    No, we have enough

    No, we have a lot
enough and a lot (of) are the only ones which can be used for mass nouns:
    Do you want more sugar?
    No, we have enough
    No, we have a lot
    *No, we have several
word order with enough
As a determiner only, enough, can precede or follow the noun:
    We have enough money for the journey
    We have money enough for the journey
The latter is rarer and more formal.
Neither a lot (of) nor several can follow the noun when they function as determiners.
a lot (of)
When this phrase is a determiner, it includes the preposition of.
As a pronoun proper, of is not allowed.
    We have a lot of time
    We have a lot of chairs
    We have a lot
    *We have a lot of

By the way, the word several is usually confined to numbers above two but fewer than ten.

The summary



Issues for teaching

The major issue is that these sorts of pronouns work very differently in different languages.  A few things in particular will bemuse learners:

  • the distinctions in English between gender of the noun a pronoun stands in for only occur with personal pronouns, and then not with all of them.  Most languages which mark gender will have all the pronouns similarly marked.
  • the distinction in English between pronouns which may stand for (or determine) mass vs. count nouns is difficult to grasp.  Many languages will not make the distinction.
  • the complications in English of statements, negatives and interrogatives do not exist in most languages.  In fact, many will use the same pronouns in all sentence types and many allow double negatives so we get
        *I don't have nothing
        *Somebody didn't come
        *Anybody came
  • that most pronouns in this guide can also be used as determiners is not a phenomenon universally shared across languages.

The consequences are:

  • handle with care and be sure to raise your learners' awareness of the distinctive uses of pronouns.
  • contextualise everything.  Pronouns cannot be handled in isolation.  Learners have to know what, exactly, the pronoun is replacing or referring to.
  • make sure controlled practice is focused.  You can't simply mix and match pronouns.  Take them conceptual area by conceptual area, as above.
  • be clear in your own mind:
    • Are you dealing with pronouns or determiners?
    • Is mass vs. count nouns an issue?
    • Is singular vs. plural an issue?
    • Is personal vs. impersonal use an issue?

Related guides
personal pronouns the guide to the other major class of pronouns
determiners many pronouns can, in other environments, act as determiners
pre-determiners some pronouns occur as pre-determiners.  See this guide for more.
assertion and non-assertion which includes consideration of many pronouns such as the any- and some-series
pro-forms for more on how items can be substituted in clauses and texts
deixis this is a more technical guide to how English expresses not here, not now and not me
demonstratives go here for a simple guide to demonstrative determiners and pronouns
cohesion for more on how referencing holds language together
concord for more on notional and proximity concord
pronoun relative clauses for the guide and links to other clause structures
discourse index for the index to guides to the general area

Main reference:
Quirk, R, Greenbaum, S, Leech, G & Svartvik, J, 1972, A Grammar of Contemporary English, Harlow: Longman